I am a little confused by L.L. Bean Signature. I like some of the new Men’s Winter things but it seems to be pretty expensive for what I get. Am I missing something? And how is it doing compared to Lands' End Canvas? And I know you aren't a huge Signature fan, but is there anything you would consider getting?
My reply (albeit a tad long!):
To the best of my knowledge, Signature’s original intent was to be a line of upscale clothing that was roughly 30% more expensive that the traditional L.L. Bean products and aimed at a younger customer. With that in mind, one question is, what do you get for that extra 30%? Edgy design? Better quality fabrics? Products made in the US instead of China?
Here are a couple of examples of comparisons between L.L. Bean and Signature on price and value.
Take the Shearling-Lined Boots.
First, L.L. Bean offers: Shearling-Lined L.L. Boots, Tall Side-Zip with these specifications:
- 14 in. tall
- Fully lined with shearling top to bottom
- Side-zip
- $189.00
- 14 in. tall
- Fully lined with shearling top to bottom
- 14-eyelet lace-up.
- $299.00
Here's a second example, the Bean’s Maine Guide Shirt.
L.L. Bean (non-Signature) has long offered this item. It is available here with the specifications of:
- 85% wool, 15% nylon
- 14 oz fabric
- $55.00
- 95% wool, 5% nylon
- 9.1 oz fabric
- $99.00
So yes, I agree that L.L. Bean seems to be using their Signature Line to charge higher prices (in these cases much more than even their 30%), often for items that I cannot see as being correspondingly better. Given Leon Leonwood is oft cited as saying "Sell good merchandise at a reasonable profit," I am not sure if these products would get his signature.
If this were 10 years ago, I might wonder if the strategy of L.L. Bean was to trade in some of their credibility and customer base for greatly increased (albeit short term) profit margins in preparation for going public. I doubt that is the case, given Sarbanes-Oxely has cooled that path for all private companies.
And I don’t want to focus on style here, as I have already done that in previous posts ad nauseum. (Although I have to say that seeing Signature using Chewonki as a setting for their recent photo and video shoot had a sense of almost Orwellian manipulation. Between my husband and my twelve summers living at Chewonki, we never saw anyone walking out of those barn doors or gathering wood in anything resembling the outfits being paraded about by the Signature models.)
Your next question about Lands' End is interesting, given all of the above. I don't have any inside knowledge. L.L. Bean is a privately held company. But here's one interesting datum point. L.L. Bean Signature and Lands' End Canvas came out at roughly the same time. Both invested in social media as part of their PR and Advertising programs to attract the new generation of Gen Yers and Millennials. Both promoted their Facebook sites heavily.
As of this writing:
- L.L. Bean Signature has roughly 3,300 fans on Facebook.
- Lands' End Canvas has more than 44,500 fans.
To answer your final question, is there anything I would consider getting?
Signature's Matinicus Rock Crewneck (formerly L.L. Bean's Blue Rock Sweater)
I just made my first purchase from Signature. I have been waiting for this particular sweater to make a comeback for the last thirty years. It’s former name was Bean’s Blue Rock sweater and they have now renamed it Matinicus Rock Crewneck. (I have often winced at Signature's equally Orwellian habit of using the names of very attractive Maine spots for items that are both unattractive and would never be worn in their namesake. But this time they got it right. This is indeed an item one might see on Matinicus Rock - a nesting area which I have visited and on which my husband has spent time banding petrels (which, by the way, is not for the faint of heart, as one has to blindly stick one’s arm down a 16 inch hole in the ground, and either encountering fuzzy little chicks to band, or, very angry mothers on the attack, all the while ducking dives from Arctic Terns)).
For those interested, this is a Men’s sweater and while I usually take a size small, as Signature slims down its items, I had to size up. So it is not the most flattering on me, and the neck opening is too small, but it is overall a very nice sweater. It would be a great item to be included in their Heritage Sweater collection, which is more expensive, but made in Norway (this one is made in China), and with the cut I prefer. But I love the pattern and colors, so I will happily wear it.


12 comments:
As a 5'4" woman would I be able to wear a men's small in this sweater?
Sarah - You can if you don't mind a long sweater! I find this one to be a bit longer than the other Men's L.L. Bean sweaters that I wear. I am 5'8" and I would prefer it to be an inch or so shorter. But it is very comfortable.
Muffy,
This post is very helpful for me as I too am 5'8" (roughly). You have saved me the time of trying Signature sweaters. That is the main reason I love L.L. Bean (non-Signature) sweaters - they actually fit! And I do concur with the Canvas vs. Signature split - I have a few items from Canvas that are very much like what you would find from the regular Lands' End line but I do not own anything from Signature (the high price along with the general ugliness and poor fit of Signature items often has me scratching my head in bewilderment).
One question I do have: What reason did you have for sizing up? (Too slim?, etc.)
Thanks again,
Ryan
I was completely unaware of Land's End Canvas line until I read this post. However, I have noticed that my regular Land's End e-mail are sent via their Land's End Canvas account.
I recall that when the Bean was preparing to launch Signature the advertising trades, e.g., AdWeek, Ad Age, et al., stated that this was Bean's attempt to reach a younger demographic (as Muffy already mentioned). There was speculation that LLBean would not succeed in the Ambercrombie/American Eagle market.
Muffy,
Love the Matinicus Rock crew on my wish list know!
Hi Ryan - Yes, that is exactly why I sized up. I hate a snug looking sweater. The garment measurement of the chest is 3 inches smaller than that of a comparable, regular L.L. Bean sweater, like the Norwegian Crewneck. (And in the process of sizing up, I added an inch and a half to the length, compared to the Norwegian Crewneck.) It used to be that the women were offered an identical, but sized appropriately, alternative to the Men's version. Now, this is what we get.
Carole - Signature feels like a bad fit for Beans. It seems that if one wanted to attract a younger, passionate base, one would a) offer less expensive items (so people could afford them even while paying off college debt), b) align the items culturally to build identification and support, perhaps environmentally focused items with organic fabrics with sustainable manufacturing processes, or products that are locally made, and c) sell them at stores close to college hubs, rather than upscale suburban malls like in Tyson's Corner, Virginia.
j.mosby - In true Muffy style, I might have to get a second one!
j. mosby - One more amusing thing. I have called L.L. Bean three times now for garment measurements and ordering, and have yet to talk to an operator who can properly pronounce, Matinicus Rock (although who can blame them)!
Muffy,
I actually laughed out loud at that women's Bird's-Eye "sweater." I am embarrassed for L.L. Bean in this case much like I was in the case of the crew to roll neck change for the fall season that you mentioned in your Freeport walk-through (http://www.llbean.com/llb/shop/65771?page=ragg-wool-sweater-roll-neck-crew). Hopefully, they will soon realize the mistake they have made.
I thought you might, Ryan!
LL Bean Signature is overpriced. I am extremely pleased with the fit, quality, variety, and prices of Land's End Canvas. Their items are soft, but well constructed. I don't even buy anything at J Crew anymore since the quality, fit, and style has gone downhill.
I was just looking at the Matinicus Rock on Signature's website, and noticed they're calling it a "replica" of the Blue Rock. But if the product is more or less the same, and they have to contort themselves to tell us what it used to be, why not just call it that? This is undoubtedly the work of a consultant who is telling them to bring their A game to a repositioning of the brand by stepping up to the plate to think outside the box.
Post a Comment